Thursday, March 5, 2015

RETREAT TO VICTORY

Retreat to victory may sound like a contradiction, but it is a historically proven military strategy that has won many a battle and more importantly many a war. The Chinese Military Strategist Sun Tzu (544 B.C. - 496 B.C.) in his book THE ART OF WAR strongly made the point that one does not win wars by fighting when he knows he will lose. He wins by fighting only the battles he knows he will win.  
Sun Tzu

"He who knows when he can fight and when he cannot will be victorious." - Sun Tzu

"The general who advances without coveting fame and retreats without fearing disgrace...is the jewel of the Kingdom." - Sun Tzu

General George Washington was not known as a great tactical commander, he was though known as a great strategic commander and many have said that without Washington, the colonist may have never won their independence. General Washington understood that he did not need to win to defeat the British Empire, he merely needed not to lose.

In the Summer of 1776, after defeating the British at Boston, he marched his army of 19,000 to New York in the hopes of defending the city against a British Fleet known to be on its way. When the British did arrive it was reported that the sheer number of British tall ships in New York Harbor made it seem as if the forests of England had marched upon America. 500 ships at a cost (in today's dollars) of $100 million each had set sail against the unruly colonialists. Unchallenged the British landed on Staten Island and settled in as more and more British ships arrived over the next few months, building up their forces to over 32,000 Troops.

Without an American navy to oppose them the British had a major tactical advantage on Staten Island. From Staten Island they could attack Long Island or Manhattan. Washington not knowing where they would strike divided his forces between the two Islands. 10,000 colonists took up positions on the Brooklyn Heights on Long Island, his remaining forces dug in to defend Manhattan.


Admiral Howe
Gen. Howe
Washington was facing the Howe brothers; General Howe and Admiral Howe (whom ironically both opposed the war with America and advocated reaching terms with the colonies.) General Howe fought in the French and Indian War proving himself an excellent tactical commander. The soldiers he brought with him to New York had on average seven years of military experiences. His officer core had much more. In comparison Washington's ragtag army had an average of only six months of military service. Washington was facing much greater force than the mere numerical advantage of the British. Since Howe had fought in the French and Indian War and knew America, Washington did not even have a home field advantage.

On August 22nd, 1776 General Howe landed  over 20,000 troops onto Long Island against the 10,000 troops of the American army. Instead of assaulting Washington's lines head on, he brilliantly out flanked Washington on Washington's far left marching through the Jamaica pass (which was guarded by only four Americans.) Howe's forces easily captured the four Americans and moved around and behind Washington's defensive lines. Washington, out foxed by Howe, wisely withdrew from his defenses and took up a new positions with his back to the East River.  Against his officers' advice General Howe did not press his advantage against Washington. He feared a repeat of Bunker Hill  (Breed's Hill) where he had lost 1000 men assaulting the rebels head on. Instead he began to dig in himself to siege the Rebels.

Battle of Long Island
Washington had lost over 1000 troops to General Howe out maneuvering him. Washington was not going to allow Howe to destroy what remained of his army. Washington realized that once the winds changed in the favor of the British navy the British would sail into the East River behind him. They would need to only bring up one or two of their ships-of-the-line and he would be trapped.

Under the cover of night Washington as silently as possible began the withdrawal of his men from Brooklyn, crossing the East River to the safety of Manhattan Island. By morning an uncommon heavy fog covered the crossing for his remaining forces to escape. Washington was reportedly the last to set foot off Brooklyn as he and his army slipped away from certain defeat.
Escaping across the East River

Washington later reconsolidated his forces on Harlem Heights on the Northern part of Manhattan Island. On September 16th 1,800 colonists held off 5,000 British soldiers. In the Battle of Harlem Heights Washington lost only 130 men compared to up to 390 British loses. Howe did finally take the battlefield, but Washington's army once again retreated to the Bronx on the mainland.

On October 28th, Washington with 3,100 troops faced up to 7,500 British in the Battle of White Plains. His men were able to hold against frontal assaults by the British, but General Howe was once again able to out flank Washington. Washington again chose to retreat his army, this time across the Hudson River into New Jersey.

Washington knew, that no matter what, the most important thing as commander was to keep his army intact. He clearly understood that retreat was always the better option to defeat. He was always willing to slink a away, lick his wounds, to fight another day. That strategy finally won the American War for Independence for the Colonists.

In 1812 it was the Russians that retreated against the invasion of Napoleon's Grande Army. The Tsar's Russian army did not engage the French and instead gave up land for time. They withdrew from the French further and further into the Russia. The Tsar's army followed a scorched earth tactic leaving nothing of worth for the advancing French. Moscow itself was set ablaze denying the French the ability to winter in the city. Napoleon, over stretched, the harsh Russian winter upon him, was forced to withdrawal and abandon his invasion of Russia. Napoleon had entered Russia with over 600,000 men, he left Russia with only a little more than 100,000.
The French Forced Retreat from Russia
In 1836 General Sam Houston also faced a much larger advisory in the War of Texas Independence. Dictator Santa Anna fielded an army of 6,000 men against the Texas rebellion. At first the Texans held him up for 12 days at the Alamo, buying Houston much needed time to raise his own army.  After the fall of the Alamo Houston was still not strong enough to face Santa Anna. He strategically retreated his forces away from the Mexican border towards the American border forcing Santa Anna to stretch out his supply lines. Houston confounded the Mexicans by also destroying anything the advancing Mexican army could use to resupply themselves, he slaughtered live stock and burnt crops, repeating the scorch earth tactic of the Tsar's army. For almost two months Houston did not engage Santa Anna and let me chase him East. Finally on April 21th Houston turned his army against Santa Anna camped at San Jacinto north of Galveston (the at the time Capital of the Texas rebellion.) After destroying a bridge to prevent the Mexicans from receiving any reinforcements Houston attacked the 1,600 Mexicans with only 900 men. His early morning attack caught the Mexicans so off guard the battle lasted only 18 minutes. 630 Mexicans were killed 208 wounded, and 730 prisoners taken. The Texans lost only 9 killed and 30 wounded, which included General Houston who took a shot to his ankle. Most importantly the Texans captured Santa Anna who had attempted to escape in disguise - Checkmate.

General Houston Accepts Santa Anna's Surrender
General Washington, the Tsar's Army, and General Houston all used retreat as a means of keeping their armies intact, stretching out the supply lines of their opponents, and only hitting their advisories when it was tactically to their advantage. Their strategy of retreat finally lead to their victories.

These conflicts prove how Sun Tzu's teachings ring true. "Know yourself and know your enemy." There is no shame in retreat, there is shame in throwing away the lives of your men. Patients and knowing our own weaknesses is often the greatest path to victory.

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

THE BENEFITS OF STRATEGIC GAMING

Gaming is very much part of the lives of today's students. They have access to games on their video game consoles, computers, tablets, and even their smart phones. The problem with computer games are they are solitary games that only interactions is with faceless unknown players in multiplayer versions. There is also the problem of a the graphic violence of many of today's games that may desensitize young people to horrific acts of violence.

Chess, although technically a war game, is not a game of graphic violence. It is a game that is rooted in Indian war game Chaturanga which was first played as far back as 600 A.D.
Chaturanga
By 1000 A.D. Chaturang evolved into two different games; the Persian, or Western, version most Americans and Europeans are accustomed to and the Chinese Chess version played in Asia.

Western or Persian Chess


Chinese Chess 
Chess is a game that has stood the test of time. It is game that does not distinguish between the players size, gender, race, age, and even physical disadvantageous.
Chess is much more than a fun game to play to pass the time. It is a game that exercises the mind of young and old. Chess has been proven by multiple studies in benefiting players to improve their higher cognitive thinking skills and academic performances in all subject matters.

How does Chess benefit higher cognitive thinking?

1.      Observational skills: Players need to develop keen observation of the positions of their pieces and their opponent's pieces on the board. They need to understand in the project range of different pieces on the playing board.

2.      Problem solving skills: No two chess games are the same. Players must learn to solve unexpected problems as they arise. They are forced to counter unexpected moves of their opponent.

3.      Concentration and memory skills: Too often games are lost by making a wrong move. Players need to remember the dynamics of how the different pieces move. They must concentrate on where their opponent moves their pieces.

4.      Projection skills, logic and reasoning: As a player improves they learn not to just react to their opponent's immediate moves, but instead begins to use logic and reasoning skills to predict what moves their opponent may make in counter to their own moves. Advances players are able to project several moves and countermoves in their heads before making a single move.

Educators at the Roberto Clemente School (C.I.S. 166) in New York report that chess has improved not only academic scores, but social performance as well. In 1988, Joyce Brown, an assistant principal and supervisor of the school’s Special Education department, and teacher Florence Mirin began studying the effect of chess on their Special Education students. “The effects have been remarkable,” Brown says. “Not only have the reading and math skills of these children soared, their ability to socialize has increased substantially, too. Our studies have shown that incidents of suspension and outside altercations have decreased by at least 60% since these children became interested in chess.” 1

As noted in the Roberto Clemente School study another measured benefit to playing chess has been in social skills and improved behavior. Other studies have confirmed these benefits in students' social behavior along with improved attendance.

Jerome Fishman, Guidance Counselor, C.J.H.S 231, Queens, NY: “I like the aspect of socialization. You get into friendly, competitive activity where no one gets hurt. Instead of two bodies slamming into each other like in football, you’ve got the meeting of two minds.- It’s strategic, and you use logic to plan an attack scheme Aside from being good for the cognitive development of these youngsters, chess develops their social skills, too. It makes them feel they belong. Whenever we get a child transferred from another school who may have maladaptive behavior, our principal (Dr. Wilton Anderson) suggests chess as a way of helping him find his niche. It also helps kids learn how to be better friends. They analyze the game and talk it over afterwards. I even had a couple of kids who never had much in common start going to each other’s houses to play chess and swap Chess Life magazines. We’ve got kids literally lining up in front of the school at 6:45 am to get a little chess in before classes start.” 2 

Move2attacK Games are an advanced forms of chess. With all the benefits of chess and more. As They are abstract strategic games where players begin the games on a equal footing. Move2attack strategic Games have the added benefit in practical skills from game play and exposing players to historical eras in the hopes of arousing their interests in history, science & technology, and political science.
Practical skills:

1.    Map reading skills: Unlike chess, which is played on a simple checkered board, Move2attacK Games are mostly played on topographical maps. Players need to learn to read the map for best movement and defensive positions. Woods, elevations, roads, major rivers, oceans, coral reefs, mountains, streams, towns, bridges, are all elements players need to be able to read and understand. It some games being able to understand compass points is also critical. 
Muskets & Sabers Playing Board

2.     Mathematics: Combat in most Move2attacK Games are determined by a combat chart based on odds. Players need to understand basic addition and subtraction, along with skills in calculating odd ratios, multiplication, division, and percentages.

3.      History and current events: Even though Move2attacK Games are not recreations of actual historical battles,  which too often were not fought on equal terms and players would have the advantage of hindsight of the actual battles. Move2attacK Games are abstract like Chess with both players mostly start at equal strength, many of the games are yet still based on historical eras. It is the hope that by making the games historically as realistic as possible they will encourage players to learn more about these periods in our history, beyond just the battlefields of the times. Games such as International Politics and the Home Front Series are designed to help players understand and spark interest in current world events.

4.      Communication Skills: The Move2attacK role playing games of Sol III: The World of Our Lord Joe and International Politics: A Political Science Simulator are multiplayer games that require players to communicate, negotiate, and cooperate with other players in order to be successful in game play.  
5.      Economic skills: Many of the Move2attacK games have elements of obtaining resources in order to purchase new units for game play. Players must make economic and strategic decisions on what they should or shouldn't purchase in order to succeed in game. Games such as Wars of Fantasy, Black vs. Blue, International Politics, and Sol III, all have economic elements in their game play. Wars of Fantasy, Sol III, and International Politics have the additional element of trade within their game structures. 

Chess has been proven to be extremely beneficial for students and seniors in helping them develop, improve and maintain their higher cognitive skills. Move2attacK Games build on the success of chess with the added practical skill benefits built into the games. There games are perfect for teachers to inspire their students in a fun way, seniors to exercise their higher cognitive, concentration, and memory skills. Most importantly these are games parents can play with their children to help their children improve their reasoning, logic, and academic scores, while spending quality time as parent and child.

 References
2 “New York City Schools Chess Program” by Christine Palm, copyright 1990.
5 http://www.Move2attacK.com